RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET HOW TO
RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET PORTABLE
RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET SOFTWARE
RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET PROFESSIONAL
RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET FREE

Amarok 2 - 5/10Īmarok has long been the king of the open source music players, with many Gnome users despite the Qt-based KDE-dependent program not quite fitting in with Gnome in terms of looks or integration. It does have iPod/device syncing, which may appeal to some. They have had a long time to stabilize it after the project originally captured imagination of Gnome community many years ago, but I can only conclude that the project seems to have lost its way given its perpetual instability. Whilst I was doing a fair amount of skipping through tracks, it's still not acceptable. I tried to give it a chance, and avoided longer tracks, but after a while it crashed again when skipping through a shorter track. First, I tried to skip through a 1 hour mix, and it crashed. That was until I started seeking in tracks. It detected the albums properly, consumed low CPU when playing, and things were looking up. It looks good, although not as nice as Banshee. This is the first time I'd tried since 2007, had it improved? My experience had always been the same - unstable. I have tried Rhythmbox intermittently since it first arrived on the scene with a bang, being the first popular iTunes clone for Gnome and GNU/Linux.

RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET PORTABLE

Feature overload? Too many chefs? Mono-related issues perhaps? It had plenty of features I didn't touch, including automatic playlist generation extension (available from yum), Gnome-do integration (I don't use Gnome-do), and iPod/device syncing (I don't own an iPod or portable music player). Then it worked fine and did what it did well and without problems while not looking as spectacular as it does now. I had used it in the past, before the 1.0 version. Given the number of contributors, I was a bit underwhelmed by the state of Banshee. Eventually I had had enough, killed it, and moved on to the next contender. The culprit was Banshee, consuming 95% CPU for seemingly doing nothing else than playing music, and doing so for considerable time - I was fairly patient. Then, after a several hours of using it, all of a sudden my laptop started to sound like a rocket and began heating up. After adding a few albums, I supposedly had 343 albums when actually it was less than 10.

It didn't seem to pick up on 1 album being an album, instead listing the same album name 80 times.

RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET HOW TO

It also took me a while to work out how to refresh my current library (I didn't initially think to look under 'Tools' - I would expect this under 'Media'). You could set a library location but that seemed to have no effect as new additions were not picked up. I could not work out how to monitor a directory, despite it being a stated feature. However, I was surprised to find it quickly unravelling for me. The layout is easy to work with and the user interface is very polished.

RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET PROFESSIONAL

It loads up fairly promptly, and has a very nice, professional look. Banshee 1.4.3 - 4/10īanshee is gaining in popularity and reputation, and has a very active developer base.

RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET SOFTWARE

I do report bugs for software that works for me. If I'm hitting serious issues nearly immediately, I feel it is probably going to be something that afflicts more than just me and is symptomatic of deeper project management issues. I also did not report bugs for players that quickly fell down on me. The ratings are for meeting my needs, so if it seems a little low for your favourite music player, bear in mind I probably have different requirements than you do. I have a lot of respect for the developers of all the projects, and generally find them very impressive, and a lower rating for a project is not me trying to suggest that it is poor for everybody.

Multiple user interfaces (curses, web, etc).

iPod / portable music player synchronization.

What is not important to me that others might consider: I will review the players in the order I tried them:Įverybody likes to interact and listen to their music collection in their own unique way. Like most people, I'm busy, so any major issues usually meant an abrupt ending to my experience with a music player. So I stipulated that I would be using the version of each that is available in Fedora 11 as a normal user would. I have been using various flavours of Linux for years and am no stranger to compiling, but I approached this article in the guise of a more normal user. Having recently upgraded to Fedora 11, I thought I'd try all the major options and see which one really did suit me. I had always ambled between different music players as I moved between Linux distributions over the years, but still I struggled to really meet my needs each time. Unlike KDE, Gnome is blessed with a lot of choice for music players.

RHYTHMBOX VS QUOD LIBET FREE

Welcome to the Free Desktop review of popular music players for the Gnome desktop!

Rhythmbox vs quod libet